"Printing the NYT Costs twice As Much As Sending Every Subscriber A Free Kindle" So says Nicholas Carlson writing in the Silicon Alley insider. ( NYT=New York Times, Kindle= An e-book reader sold by Amazon)
A couple of years ago I took the New York Times to task for using too much technology How Times change! Or do they? Common sense indicates that if it's cheaper to use an electronic device than to use paper the NYT should just do it.
I trudged through the comments on the article looking for informed quantitative criticism, but in usual manner of Web comments they quickly became dreary. I did like the one by Javik "Imagine how expensive it will be when you have a new puppy and you have to cover the floor with a collection of Kindles while potty training."